This blog tracks the epic of kick-starting a whole writing career, with spies and thrillers, now saints and vampires. I cover the creative process, stuff that blows up, history, philosophy, and theology. If you like any or all of the above, you'll like this one. We talk about comic books, movies, music, and writing. Usually, all at the same time. [Note: All Amazon links here are associate links. Which means nothing to you, but it means Declan Finn gets a few pennies for the sale. Thank you.]
Tuesday, August 25, 2015
The Wrong Kind of Laugh: Hugos as Joke
It has come to my attention that we of
the Sad Puppies are taking the “True Fan” Puppy Kickers, far, far
too seriously. Once, I joked that I was the Sad Puppy comedy corner
with my Sad Puppies Bite Back series, Tom Knighton pointed out to methat I fit right in. After all, the spokes-critter was a Manatee for
God's sake – all the Tweets were some variety of “Hooonnn.”
And for all that, we're still taking
them too seriously.
I've seen multiple reactions to the
Hugo awards ceremony. Tom Kratman said, “Yes!” Larry shrugged
and said “I told you so.” Ringo said “So glad to have all my previous statements about the Hugos proven right. There is no point to tilting a diseased windmill.” Vox Day was happy to get five No Awards. Tom Kratman wanted even
more. Cedar Sanderson makes me wonder if she's joining WitSec.
Sure, they threw insults at us. But
I've been a fat, nerdy, Conservative Catholic New Yorker for years,
if I let insults bother me, I'd have slit my wrists already.
But let's look at this – They had a
Dalek come out to present the award for Best Dramatic Presentation
(Short form), and a Dalek announces
that it was a fan of John Scalzi, Puppy Kicker -in Chief…
Could I have a show
of hands? How many people would want their spokes-critter to be a
genocidal alien Space Nazi?
This is like atheists getting a personal
endorsement by Satan. This is Planned Parenthood getting a quote from
Moloch. I'd really rather not get an endorsement by Adolf Hitler, thank you.
These
“True Fans” thought it was a *good idea* to
get an endorsement from one of the most famously evil creatures in
science fiction. Hell, if they had said “Vox Day,” that would
have at least fit the theme they had going of Vox as Supreme Dark
Lord. Since Daleks run on hate, it would have fit Larry's joke of
being the International Lord thereof.
But
no, they picked a Dalek for a fan. Nice going, “True Fans.” Do
you idiots even watch Doctor
Who? Or did you figure that it was nominated every year, then google it to find the first thing that came up?
But these are "True Fans" ... and if they were any more tone deaf, they would be unable to tell the difference between Mozart and banging garbage can lids together.
There was also a
comedy skit where overweight women dressed in Star Trek outfits
stopped “Death” from stealing the Hugos … and somehow, not a
single redshirt dies? How is this even funny? Given what we've come
to expect from redshirts, how is this even possible?
But, no, Scalzi wrote a book called redshirts, so this is the heroic Scalzi saving the Hugos from the evil Vox Day ... this is just badly done Soviet Propaganda at this point.
This
feels like growing up in grammar school, back when being a science
fiction fan was anathema .
Bullies would make jokes about fandom, but since they didn't know
anything about fandom, the jokes made no sense whatsoever. Sure, the
bullies thought it was hilarious, the targets of the jokes wondered
what the hell they were talking about.
As the night went
on, it just became more and more farcical. The best “fan” author, named Mixon, went up and then, before God, man, and everyone, thanked Tor editor
Patrick Hayden for all his help.
Funny,
when half the internet suggests that something screwy is going on with
the Haydens, and their relationship to the Hugos, the last thing I'd
want is the winner for best fan writer thanking the professional editor (adjusted for values of
professional) for all his help. This in no way smells of bias.
Pardon me if I
start banging my head against a wall. After a while, I might even
come to enjoy it.
This was before said fan writer shouted “black lives matter!” like some hysterical harpy from
hell. Politicizing the Hugos? No, not at all.
Honestly, don't you
just love it when the “True Fans” spend all this time boasting
about how wonderfully neutral they are, and then double down on the
psycho-leftist front?
Imagine any
outsiders looking at the Hugos. Imagine a relatively neutral party, who only
tuned into the Hugos because he wanted to see if Kevin J. Anderson or
Jim Butcher won. First, this person would have scratched their head as s/he wondered why it took over an hour to give out two awards. Then, this person would have seen a collection of mummies on parade and an audience who
applauded the fact that no awards were given in five major categories – and then wonder who John C. Wright was that he was
screwed out of a Hugo when he had 3 out of the 5 nominations.
And after all that,
for every boast by George RR Martin made about how the Hugo voters
have always meant well, and have integrity, and for every impression
he gave off as trying to be the reasonable one, Martin is the one who
gave out personal awards to people he thought should have won. Which
means he was in on it before hand – otherwise, how did he know what
awards to give out to who? Or do we really think he was going to do
this regardless of any Hugo win, loss or no award?
This is a joke.
From start to finish, the Hugos was an overwritten (it went
overtime), poorly run farce. Even when I didn't agree with Jon
Stewart, I could at least intellectually understand how his jokes
could be funny if I worked at it hard enough. But this? I would say
all of these jokes were lauded with applause given by brain damaged
seals, but I'm afraid of offending brain damaged seals.
I watched the Hugos
with a friend of mine, side-by-side with a Webinar presented by Vox
Day. We had been expecting Darth Vader, and instead got Super Nerd,
who my friend described as cuddly – yes, cuddly. Vox came off as
reasonable and intelligent, and well spoken, and the “True Fans”
came off as the CHORFs they are.
Once upon a time, a
script doctor was called in to work on a play. He removed part of a
scene, and was told “You can't remove that line! It gets a laugh
every night.”
The script doctor
answered: “Yes, but it's the wrong kind of laugh.”
I've been laughing
at the Hugo awards since Saturday night. But trust me, from the CHORF
point of view, it's definitely the wrong kind of laugh.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Couldn't agree more. The Hugos have been a sci-fi joke to rival the film version of Battlefield Earth since Patrick Nielsen Hayden conspired to create his own personal award category.
ReplyDeleteStill, it's hard not to sympathize with folks who grew up venerating the Hugos as the pinnacle of SFF achievement. Disillusionment is rough, but in the long run casting off illusions is always worth the cost.
Besides, Hugo infatuation seems most prevalent among traditionally published authors of the Baby Boomer to early Gen X demographics. The current crop of indie only authors and fans with no living memory of Big 5 SF novels that aren't mostly garbage tend not to even know about the Hugos, or if they do, they don't care.
The demise of NY publishing was always going to make the Hugos irrelevant. The CHORFs just hastened the end by a few years.
There's plenty of laughter, though much is off-screen.
ReplyDeleteI have spent since the awards ended laughing.
ReplyDeleteHow can it be anything but funny?
Cheering at five no awards? Who cheers at not getting awards. Not to mention admitting that would not have happened if Vox Day - never heard of the guy, he does not sound important - had not had the wrong politics. And then proving that by handing out awards anyway.
This coming from GRRM no less,.
The Awards ceremony sounds amazingly terrible. I must watch it.
Endorsed by a Dalek...the idiots.
Thank you for this post.
Regards
Raku
One thing that stuck out to me at the Hugos was Best Dramatic Presentation, Short Form did not bother to send anyone to accept the award indicating they did not place much value on it?
ReplyDelete